Longevity & Mitochondrial
MOTS-c — Molecular Weight, Sequence & Mitochondrial Research Reference
MOTS-c is a 16-residue peptide encoded not in nuclear DNA but within the mitochondrial genome itself — one of a small class of mitochondrial-derived peptides identified only in the last decade.
MOTS-c at a glance
- Compound
- MOTS-c
- Classification
- Mitochondrial-derived peptide (12S rRNA open reading frame)
- Molecular formula
- C101H152N28O22S2
- Molecular weight
- 2,174.6 g/mol (free base, average)
- Amino acid count
- 16
- Amino acid sequence
- MRWQEMGYIFYPRKLR
- Reported half-life
- Not established for exogenous administration
- Research status
- Not approved; preclinical and biomarker research
Values are reference figures compiled from the sources cited on this page, not batch specifications. Confirm against the certificate of analysis for any specific material.
01What is MOTS-c?
MOTS-c (mitochondrial open reading frame of the 12S rRNA type-c) is a 16-amino-acid peptide with the sequence MRWQEMGYIFYPRKLR, formula C101H152N28O22S2 and a molecular weight of 2,174.6 g/mol. It is encoded within the 12S ribosomal RNA region of mitochondrial DNA and translated from a short open reading frame — an arrangement that was not recognised until its identification in 2015.
Mechanistically the peptide has been linked to AMPK activation and to the folate–AICAR one-carbon pathway, with published work in skeletal muscle glucose handling, diet-induced obesity models and exercise physiology. Circulating MOTS-c has separately been studied as a metabolic biomarker, and endogenous plasma concentrations have been measured in human cohorts.
That last point is where the evidence stops. Measuring endogenous MOTS-c is not the same as characterising administered MOTS-c, and no human pharmacokinetic data for exogenous administration exists. Any half-life figure attached to this compound in secondary sources should be traced to a primary study before it is relied on; this record reports the value as not established.
02Molecular information
| Molecular formula | C101H152N28O22S2 (free base) |
|---|---|
| Molecular weight | 2174.6 g/mol (average, free base) |
| Amino acid count | 16 |
| Classification | Mitochondrial-derived peptide (MDP); 16-residue linear peptide encoded by a short open reading frame within the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene (MT-RNR1); AMPK-pathway modulator |
| CAS number | 1627580-64-6 |
| PubChem CID | 155885767 (MOTS-c, human). A second record, CID 146675088, carries the same formula. |
| UNII / DrugBank | No UNII or DrugBank drug entry retrieved. Not an approved drug substance. The mitochondrial parent gene is MT-RNR1 (UniProt/MITOMAP annotate the 12S rRNA locus; MOTS-c is not a UniProt protein entry). |
| Synonyms | MOTS-c (human), Mitochondrial ORF of the 12S rRNA type-c, MOTSc, MOTS-c human acetate, MRWQEMGYIFYPRKLR |
PubChem CID 155885767 computes an average molecular weight of 2174.6 g/mol and an exact (monoisotopic) mass of 2174.1110958 Da for C101H152N28O22S2 — the roughly 0.5 Da gap between average and monoisotopic values is the usual isotope-distribution effect at this size and is a common source of apparent disagreement between databases and mass-spec results. Salt form accounts for the second common discrepancy: the MedChemExpress datasheet for MOTS-c (human) acetate, catalogue HY-P2048A, gives formula C103H156N28O24S2 and MW 2234.64, which is the free base plus exactly one acetate (60.05). Trifluoroacetate salt forms are also commercially supplied and add roughly 114 per TFA counter-ion. Because MOTS-c has three arginines and one lysine, multiple counter-ions per molecule are chemically plausible depending on the purification, so stated salt masses vary by lot and supplier. Always reconcile a certificate-of-analysis mass against the declared counter-ion and net peptide content rather than assuming the free-base value.
03Amino acid sequence
One-letter sequence
MRWQEMGYIFYPRKLR
Three-letter sequence
Met-Arg-Trp-Gln-Glu-Met-Gly-Tyr-Ile-Phe-Tyr-Pro-Arg-Lys-Leu-Arg
Structural modifications
None. MOTS-c is an unmodified linear L-peptide with a free N-terminal alpha-amino group on Met1 and a free C-terminal carboxyl on Arg16. No acylation, no amidation, no cyclisation, no PEGylation, no non-natural residues. There are no disulfide bonds — the two sulfur atoms in the formula are the thioether sulfurs of Met1 and Met6, not cysteine thiols, though those methionines are oxidation-prone and are the expected degradation/impurity site. A point of genuine biological interest rather than chemical modification: the 51-base-pair open reading frame lies within the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene, and the encoded peptide corresponds to translation using the standard cytoplasmic genetic code rather than the mitochondrial code, because mitochondrial translation of this ORF would produce tandem start and stop codons [3].
04Pharmacokinetic information
| Reported half-life | Not established for exogenously administered MOTS-c in humans. |
|---|
Half-life context
There is no published human pharmacokinetic study of administered MOTS-c. The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation assessment states plainly that MOTS-c has 'low bioavailability, poor stability, and short half-lives' and that half-life in vivo is 'not yet established' [4]. What has been measured is endogenous behaviour, which is not the same thing: Reynolds et al. showed that in young sedentary men, circulating MOTS-c rose 1.6-fold during and 1.5-fold after acute exercise and returned to baseline within 4 hours of rest, with an 11.9-fold relative increase in skeletal muscle [2]. That 4-hour normalisation describes the endogenous exercise response, not the elimination half-life of an injected dose, and the two must not be conflated. Animal work has used repeated intraperitoneal dosing (5 or 15 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks, or three times weekly in late-life protocols in mice) without reporting PK parameters [2]. Sample stability is itself a documented problem: circulating MOTS-c levels fall by about one quarter when stored at 4°C for 24 hours [4], which complicates comparison of published plasma concentrations across studies. The 2023 Journal of Translational Medicine review contains no pharmacokinetic, half-life, bioavailability or delivery data for MOTS-c [3]. Any single half-life figure quoted commercially for MOTS-c is unsupported.
A peptide does not have one universal half-life. Reported values differ between plasma and terminal half-life, between species, between routes of administration, and between formulations and assay methods. Where sources disagree, this page gives the range and its context rather than a single number.
05Research focus
Primary research areas
- AMPK activation and the folate-AICAR pathway
- skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity and glucose metabolism
- exercise physiology and mitochondrial-nuclear signalling
- diet-induced obesity and metabolic homeostasis in rodents
- age-associated physical decline in mice
- circulating MOTS-c as a metabolic biomarker
Research context
MOTS-c (mitochondrial open reading frame of the 12S rRNA type-c) is a 16-amino-acid peptide, MRWQEMGYIFYPRKLR, identified relatively recently. Lee et al. reported it in Cell Metabolism in 2015 after searching mitochondrial DNA for additional short open reading frames of the kind that had yielded humanin; a 51-base-pair sORF within the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene encodes the peptide [1]. Its identification in 2015 makes MOTS-c a young research subject relative to the other compounds in this set, and much of the literature is less than a decade old.
The original report described skeletal muscle as the apparent primary target organ and proposed a specific mechanism: MOTS-c inhibits the folate cycle and its tethered de novo purine biosynthesis, causing AICAR accumulation which activates AMPK [1][3]. In mice, MOTS-c treatment prevented age-dependent and high-fat-diet-induced insulin resistance and diet-induced obesity [1]. Reynolds et al. subsequently characterised MOTS-c as exercise-responsive: in young sedentary men, skeletal-muscle levels rose 11.9-fold relative to pre-exercise values and circulating levels rose 1.6-fold during and 1.5-fold after exercise, returning to baseline within 4 hours. In mice given intraperitoneal MOTS-c at 5 or 15 mg/kg/day, treadmill running duration and distance increased across young, middle-aged and old animals, and late-life dosing improved grip strength, stride length and walking capacity in very old mice [2].
Human data are observational only. Circulating MOTS-c has been measured in relation to age and metabolic status, though findings are inconsistent across cohorts — reported lower in obese male children and adolescents in one study and higher in obese mothers and newborns in another, with low expression correlating with HbA1c in type 2 diabetes [3]. An independent assessment notes a 6.4% median lifespan increase in aged mice (a trend, p=0.05) and, in humans, no research supporting prevention of cognitive decline [4].
06Research evidence and limitations
No human trial of MOTS-c itself has been published. The only human interventional data concerns CB4211, a MOTS-c analogue developed by CohBar — a Phase 1b in 20 participants with NAFLD which met its safety endpoint and showed ALT and AST reductions, but produced liver fat reduction comparable to placebo (-5% versus -4.8%); persistent injection-site reactions were common, CohBar has since dissolved, and no trials are ongoing [4]. Exogenous pharmacokinetics in humans are entirely absent: no bioavailability, no half-life, no distribution or clearance data in any species by any route [3][4]. Human observational findings on circulating MOTS-c are inconsistent in direction between cohorts [3], and assay comparability is undermined by documented sample instability [4]. Rodent efficacy comes overwhelmingly from intraperitoneal dosing at 5-15 mg/kg/day — routes and exposures with no established human equivalence. Mechanistic claims about nuclear translocation and AMPK activation rest on cell and mouse work, not human tissue intervention. Central nervous system claims are specifically contradicted: the ADDF assessment states that because of its lack of blood-brain-barrier penetrance, peripherally administered MOTS-c is not considered viable for CNS indications, and that no human research supports prevention of dementia or cognitive decline [4]. Long-term human safety is unknown, and FDA has raised immunogenicity concerns about compounded MOTS-c [5].
Regulatory status
Not approved as a drug in any jurisdiction. MOTS-c is a research-use-only substance with no FDA approval, no EMA marketing authorisation, and no active clinical development programme — CohBar, which developed the MOTS-c analogue CB4211, has dissolved and no ongoing trials were identified [4]. In the United States, FDA added MOTS-c to the list of bulk drug substances for use in compounding that may present significant safety risks (503A Category 2) in October 2023, with the stated concern that 'compounded drugs containing MOTs-C may pose significant risk for immunogenicity' [5]. As of the 22 April 2026 revision of that FDA page, MOTS-c appears among the substances withdrawn from Category 2, part of an announced removal of twelve peptides effective around 22 April 2026, with Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee meetings scheduled for 23-24 July 2026 and before February 2027 to consider whether these substances should be added to the 503A bulks list [5]. Removal from Category 2 does not authorise compounding: MOTS-c is not on the 503A bulks list, and the position is best described as unsettled pending FDA and PCAC action. This status is in active flux and must be re-verified at time of publication.
07Research material and sourcing notes
Reported research-use reconstitution information
Supplier technical documentation only (MedChemExpress datasheet HY-P2048A, MOTS-c human acetate): in vitro solubility in water is stated as greater than or equal to 5 mg/mL (2.24 mM), and in DMSO as 4 mg/mL (1.79 mM) with ultrasonic treatment required. No pH value is given. No peer-reviewed reconstitution protocol and no pharmaceutical manufacturer specification exists, because MOTS-c is not an approved product. Preclinical studies administered MOTS-c by intraperitoneal injection in mice without publishing formulation detail [2]. Note that the sample-stability observation above (about 25% loss at 4°C over 24 hours in biological matrix) suggests that prepared solutions should not be assumed stable at refrigerator temperature [4]. No dosing guidance is given here.
Reported storage and stability information
Supplier technical documentation only (MedChemExpress datasheet HY-P2048A). Lyophilised powder: -80°C for up to 2 years, or -20°C for up to 1 year. In solvent: -80°C for up to 6 months, or -20°C for up to 1 month, sealed and protected from moisture. Separately, the ADDF assessment reports that MOTS-c levels in stored samples decrease by roughly one quarter after 24 hours at 4°C [4], which is a stability observation relevant to assay handling rather than a storage specification. No pharmaceutical-grade stability data exists. Methionine oxidation is the expected chemical degradation pathway and argues for storage under inert atmosphere and protection from light where practical.
Identity and sourcing notes
Identity is comparatively tractable for a 16-mer but has specific traps. The two methionines (positions 1 and 6) oxidise readily to methionine sulfoxide, adding 16 Da each; oxidised species are the most common real-world impurity and can be mistaken for a different product on mass alone. Expect and require RP-HPLC purity plus high-resolution MS (free-base monoisotopic 2174.111, average 2174.6) and, ideally, MS/MS sequence confirmation given that the tryptophan and the Arg/Lys content make the peptide susceptible to both oxidation and enzymatic nicking. Salt form must be stated: PubChem records the free base, MedChemExpress supplies an acetate at 2234.64, and TFA salts are widespread; a nominal '10 mg' vial of TFA salt contains materially less peptide than 10 mg free base, so net peptide content on the certificate of analysis matters more than gross mass. Naming is generally consistent — 'MOTS-c', 'MOTS-c (human)' and 'MOTSc' refer to the same sequence — but note that CB4211 is a distinct MOTS-c analogue, not MOTS-c, and clinical data for CB4211 must not be attributed to MOTS-c. Sequence-level check: MRWQEMGYIFYPRKLR. Given documented instability in biological matrix, cold-chain integrity on receipt is a legitimate quality question. This is informational, not promotional.
Reconstitution ratios and storage windows are handling conventions that depend on the intended working concentration, the solvent, the container and the study design. They are reported here with their source and are not intrinsic properties of the molecule.
08References and evidence
Primary sources
- The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c promotes metabolic homeostasis and reduces obesity and insulin resistanceprimary literature
- MOTS-c is an exercise-induced mitochondrial-encoded regulator of age-dependent physical decline and muscle homeostasisprimary literature
- Mitochondria-derived peptide MOTS-c: effects and mechanisms related to stress, metabolism and agingreview
- MOTS-c — Cognitive Vitality Report for Researchersreview
- Certain Bulk Drug Substances for Use in Compounding that May Present Significant Safety Risks (MOTS-c listed among withdrawn substances as of the 22 April 2026 revision)regulatory
Chemical and molecular databases
- PubChem CID 155885767 (MOTS-c, human) — C101H152N28O22S2, average MW 2174.6 g/mol, exact mass 2174.1110958, CAS 1627580-64-6
- PubChem CID 146675088 (Mots-c) — same molecular formula
- MedChemExpress technical datasheet HY-P2048A, MOTS-c (human) acetate — C103H156N28O24S2, MW 2234.64, solubility and storage (supplier technical documentation)
- Fuku N, et al. 'The mitochondrial-derived peptide MOTS-c: a player in exceptional longevity?', Aging Cell, 2015 — reported association of an mtDNA variant within the MOTS-c ORF with longevity in a Japanese cohort (full text paywalled; bibliographic data only)
Molecular identity and chemical properties on this page are compiled from the referenced scientific and chemical databases above. Pharmacokinetic values are reported from published literature where available. Handling information is attributed to its source type — published literature or manufacturer technical documentation — wherever it appears. Values vary by molecular form, salt form, formulation, assay methodology, species and study conditions.
10Frequently asked questions
What is MOTS-c?
MOTS-c is a 16-amino-acid mitochondrial-derived peptide encoded by a short open reading frame within the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene (MT-RNR1). It was identified in 2015 by Lee and colleagues. Research describes it as acting on skeletal muscle through the folate-AICAR-AMPK pathway. It is not an approved drug and is supplied for laboratory research use only.
What is the molecular weight of MOTS-c?
The free base has average molecular weight 2174.6 g/mol and exact monoisotopic mass 2174.111 Da, for formula C101H152N28O22S2, per PubChem CID 155885767. The acetate salt sold as research material is C103H156N28O24S2 at 2234.64 g/mol — one acetate heavier. Trifluoroacetate salts are also common and add roughly 114 per counter-ion.
What is the amino acid sequence of MOTS-c?
MRWQEMGYIFYPRKLR, or Met-Arg-Trp-Gln-Glu-Met-Gly-Tyr-Ile-Phe-Tyr-Pro-Arg-Lys-Leu-Arg. It is a 16-residue unmodified linear peptide with free N- and C-termini, no disulfide bonds and no non-natural residues. The two sulfur atoms belong to the methionines at positions 1 and 6, which are the peptide's main oxidation-prone sites during storage and handling.
What is the reported half-life of MOTS-c?
Not established. No pharmacokinetic study of administered MOTS-c has been published in humans or animals; an independent assessment states the in vivo half-life is not yet established and describes low bioavailability and poor stability. Endogenous circulating MOTS-c rises with acute exercise and returns to baseline within about 4 hours, but that describes the endogenous response, not elimination kinetics.
What is MOTS-c studied for?
Reported research areas are AMPK activation via the folate and de novo purine biosynthesis pathway, skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity, diet-induced obesity and glucose metabolism in mice, exercise responsiveness in human muscle and plasma, and age-associated physical decline in rodents. It has also been measured observationally as a circulating metabolic biomarker in human cohorts. No human efficacy is established.
Has MOTS-c been tested in human clinical trials?
MOTS-c itself has not. The only interventional human data concerns CB4211, a MOTS-c analogue from CohBar: a Phase 1b in 20 participants with NAFLD met its safety endpoint and reduced ALT and AST, but liver fat reduction matched placebo. Injection-site reactions were common. CohBar has dissolved and no trials are ongoing.
Why is MOTS-c called a mitochondrial-derived peptide?
Because it is encoded within mitochondrial DNA rather than the nuclear genome — specifically a 51-base-pair open reading frame inside the 12S rRNA gene. Reviews note the encoded sequence corresponds to the standard cytoplasmic genetic code rather than the mitochondrial code, implying translation most likely occurs in the cytoplasm, since mitochondrial translation would yield tandem start and stop codons.
Editorial and review information
- Compiled by
- NuGenia Research Editorial Team
- Scientific review
- Pending qualified reviewer
- Last reviewed
- Data confidence
- medium
This page is a molecular and bibliographic reference compiled from the sources cited above. It is not medical advice, and it does not describe or recommend any use of this compound in humans or animals.
7 data points on this page are held in the library’s verification queue for confirmation against a further primary source. Where a value is contested, the page says so in the relevant section rather than presenting a single figure.